The short verdict
Scores pending
We haven’t scored these yet. Use the measured differences and full specs below.
SM-R365NZKANEE activity tracker SAMOLED 3.81 cm (1.5")—
SM-R370 AMOLED Wristband activity tracker 2.41 cm (0.95") Black—
Choose the SM-R365NZKANEE activity tracker SAMOLED 3.81 cm (1.5") if
- Larger screen (1.5 vs 0.95 in)
- Bigger battery (200 vs 120 mAh)
Choose the SM-R370 AMOLED Wristband activity tracker 2.41 cm (0.95") Black if
- Easier one-handed use (1" vs 1.5")
- Lighter in the hand (24 vs 34 g)
Key differences
Measured differences only. Ties and tiny gaps are left out.
Why pick theSM-R365NZKANEE activity tracker SAMOLED 3.81 cm (1.5")2 wins+58%Larger screen1.5 vs 0.95 in
+67%Bigger battery200 vs 120 mAh
Check priceNo store price yet
Why pick theSM-R370 AMOLED Wristband activity tracker 2.41 cm (0.95") Black2 wins−0.6"Easier one-handed use1" vs 1.5"
−10 gLighter in the hand24 vs 34 g
Check priceNo store price yet
Full specs
Side-by-side specifications
Specs verified against manufacturer data. Prices in USD before tax; we may earn a commission from qualifying purchases.
Community
One vote per person. Results appear after you vote.Which would you buy?
People also comparevsSamsung SM-R150 White vs Samsung SM-R365NZKANEE activity tracker SAMOLED 3.81 cm (1.5")vsSamsung Galaxy Fit AMOLED Wristband activity tracker 2.41 cm (0.95") Black vs Samsung SM-R365NZKANEE activity tracker SAMOLED 3.81 cm (1.5")vsSamsung Galaxy Fit-e PMOLED Wristband activity tracker 1.88 cm (0.74") White vs Samsung SM-R370 AMOLED Wristband activity tracker 2.41 cm (0.95") Black