The short verdict
Scores pending
We haven’t scored these yet. Use the measured differences and full specs below.
Galaxy Fit2 AMOLED Wristband activity tracker 2.79 cm (1.1") Black—
Gear Fit2 SAMOLED Wristband activity tracker 3.81 cm (1.5") IP68 Black—
Choose the Galaxy Fit2 AMOLED Wristband activity tracker 2.79 cm (1.1") Black if
- Easier one-handed use (1.1" vs 1.5")
- Lighter in the hand (21 vs 30 g)
Choose the Gear Fit2 SAMOLED Wristband activity tracker 3.81 cm (1.5") IP68 Black if
- Runners who want GPS without a full smartwatch.
Key differences
Measured differences only. Ties and tiny gaps are left out.
Why pick theGalaxy Fit2 AMOLED Wristband activity tracker 2.79 cm (1.1") Black2 wins−0.4"Easier one-handed use1.1" vs 1.5"
−9 gLighter in the hand21 vs 30 g
Check priceNo store price yet
Why pick theGear Fit2 SAMOLED Wristband activity tracker 3.81 cm (1.5") IP68 Black3 wins+36%Larger screen1.5 vs 1.1 in
+26%Bigger battery200 vs 159 mAh
+2400%More RAM for multitasking0.5 vs 0.02 GB
Check priceNo store price yet
Full specs
Side-by-side specifications
Specs verified against manufacturer data. Prices in USD before tax; we may earn a commission from qualifying purchases.
Community
One vote per person. Results appear after you vote.Which would you buy?
People also comparevsHonor Band 5 AMOLED Armband activity tracker 2.41 cm (0.95") Black vs Samsung Galaxy Fit2 AMOLED Wristband activity tracker 2.79 cm (1.1") BlackvsSamsung Gear Fit2 SAMOLED Wristband activity tracker 3.81 cm (1.5") IP68 Black vs Samsung SM-R150 WhitevsSamsung Galaxy Fit-e PMOLED Wristband activity tracker 1.88 cm (0.74") White vs Samsung Galaxy Fit2 AMOLED Wristband activity tracker 2.79 cm (1.1") Black