The short verdict
Scores pending
We haven’t scored these yet. Use the measured differences and full specs below.
Galaxy Fit-e PMOLED Wristband activity tracker 1.88 cm (0.74") White—
Galaxy Fit2 AMOLED Wristband activity tracker 2.79 cm (1.1") Black—
Choose the Galaxy Fit-e PMOLED Wristband activity tracker 1.88 cm (0.74") White if
- Easier one-handed use (0.7" vs 1.1")
- Lighter in the hand (15 vs 21 g)
Choose the Galaxy Fit2 AMOLED Wristband activity tracker 2.79 cm (1.1") Black if
- Larger screen (1.1 vs 0.74 in)
- More RAM for multitasking (0.02 vs 0 GB)
Key differences
Measured differences only. Ties and tiny gaps are left out.
Why pick theGalaxy Fit-e PMOLED Wristband activity tracker 1.88 cm (0.74") White2 wins−0.4"Easier one-handed use0.7" vs 1.1"
−6 gLighter in the hand15 vs 21 g
Check priceNo store price yet
Why pick theGalaxy Fit2 AMOLED Wristband activity tracker 2.79 cm (1.1") Black2 wins+49%Larger screen1.1 vs 0.74 in
+15525%More RAM for multitasking0.02 vs 0 GB
Check priceNo store price yet
Full specs
Side-by-side specifications
Specs verified against manufacturer data. Prices in USD before tax; we may earn a commission from qualifying purchases.
Community
One vote per person. Results appear after you vote.Which would you buy?
People also comparevsSamsung Galaxy Fit-e PMOLED Wristband activity tracker 1.88 cm (0.74") White vs Samsung Gear Fit2 SAMOLED Wristband activity tracker 3.81 cm (1.5") IP68 BlackvsSamsung Galaxy Fit-e PMOLED Wristband activity tracker 1.88 cm (0.74") White vs Samsung SM-R370 AMOLED Wristband activity tracker 2.41 cm (0.95") BlackvsSamsung Galaxy Fit AMOLED Wristband activity tracker 2.41 cm (0.95") Black vs Samsung Galaxy Fit-e PMOLED Wristband activity tracker 1.88 cm (0.74") White