The short verdict
Scores pending
We haven’t scored these yet. Use the measured differences and full specs below.
Galaxy Fit2 AMOLED Wristband activity tracker 2.79 cm (1.1") Black—
SM-R370 AMOLED Wristband activity tracker 2.41 cm (0.95") Black—
Choose the Galaxy Fit2 AMOLED Wristband activity tracker 2.79 cm (1.1") Black if
- Larger screen (1.1 vs 0.95 in)
- Bigger battery (159 vs 120 mAh)
- Lighter in the hand (21 vs 24 g)
Choose the SM-R370 AMOLED Wristband activity tracker 2.41 cm (0.95") Black if
- Easier one-handed use (1" vs 1.1")
Key differences
Measured differences only. Ties and tiny gaps are left out.
Why pick theGalaxy Fit2 AMOLED Wristband activity tracker 2.79 cm (1.1") Black3 wins+16%Larger screen1.1 vs 0.95 in
+33%Bigger battery159 vs 120 mAh
−3 gLighter in the hand21 vs 24 g
Check priceNo store price yet
Why pick theSM-R370 AMOLED Wristband activity tracker 2.41 cm (0.95") Black1 win−0.2"Easier one-handed use1" vs 1.1"
Check priceNo store price yet
Full specs
Side-by-side specifications
Specs verified against manufacturer data. Prices in USD before tax; we may earn a commission from qualifying purchases.
Community
One vote per person. Results appear after you vote.Which would you buy?
People also comparevsSamsung Galaxy Fit-e PMOLED Wristband activity tracker 1.88 cm (0.74") White vs Samsung Galaxy Fit2 AMOLED Wristband activity tracker 2.79 cm (1.1") BlackvsSamsung SM-R365NZKANEE activity tracker SAMOLED 3.81 cm (1.5") vs Samsung SM-R370 AMOLED Wristband activity tracker 2.41 cm (0.95") BlackvsSamsung Galaxy Fit-e PMOLED Wristband activity tracker 1.88 cm (0.74") White vs Samsung SM-R370 AMOLED Wristband activity tracker 2.41 cm (0.95") Black