The short verdict
Scores pending
We haven’t scored these yet. Use the measured differences and full specs below.
Band 5 AMOLED Wristband activity tracker 2.79 cm (1.1") Black—
Gear Fit2 SAMOLED Wristband activity tracker 3.81 cm (1.5") IP68 Black—
Choose the Band 5 AMOLED Wristband activity tracker 2.79 cm (1.1") Black if
- Easier one-handed use (1.1" vs 1.5")
- Lighter in the hand (24 vs 30 g)
Choose the Gear Fit2 SAMOLED Wristband activity tracker 3.81 cm (1.5") IP68 Black if
- Runners who want GPS without a full smartwatch.
Key differences
Measured differences only. Ties and tiny gaps are left out.
Why pick theBand 5 AMOLED Wristband activity tracker 2.79 cm (1.1") Black2 wins−0.4"Easier one-handed use1.1" vs 1.5"
−6 gLighter in the hand24 vs 30 g
Check priceNo store price yet
Why pick theGear Fit2 SAMOLED Wristband activity tracker 3.81 cm (1.5") IP68 Black2 wins+36%Larger screen1.5 vs 1.1 in
+60%Bigger battery200 vs 125 mAh
Check priceNo store price yet
Full specs
Side-by-side specifications
Specs verified against manufacturer data. Prices in USD before tax; we may earn a commission from qualifying purchases.
Community
One vote per person. Results appear after you vote.Which would you buy?
People also comparevsCircular Ring 3 Pro vs Samsung Gear Fit2 SAMOLED Wristband activity tracker 3.81 cm (1.5") IP68 BlackvsAmazfit Band 5 AMOLED Wristband activity tracker 2.79 cm (1.1") Black vs Speediance Gym Monster UltravsAmazfit Band 5 AMOLED Wristband activity tracker 2.79 cm (1.1") Black vs Circular Ring 3