Tested · Scored · RankedNEWinstax mini Evo 2 — full review & score →
Head to head · 2 products

HW-Q950A vs MX-T50

Verified specs side by side. The green tick marks the better value on each measurable row.

Comparing 2 products
HW-Q950A
HW-Q950A—Score pending
Check price
View specs
MX-T50
MX-T50—Score pending
Check price
View specs
The short verdict

Scores pending

We haven’t scored these yet. Use the measured differences and full specs below.

HW-Q950A
—
MX-T50
—
Choose the HW-Q950A if
  • Movie fans who want true rear and height channels.
Full specs →
At a glance

Key differences

Measured differences only. Ties and tiny gaps are left out.
Why pick theHW-Q950A1 win
−4,200 gLighter in the hand7,100 vs 11,300 g
Check priceNo store price yet
Why pick theMX-T500 wins
No measured advantages in our spec data. Check the full specs below.
Check priceNo store price yet
Full specs

Side-by-side specifications

Battery & charging1 difference
Sleep power
0.5 W
0.5 W
Soundbar power consumption
47 W
110 W
Design6 differences
Weight
7100 g
11300 g
Depth
138 mm
323 mm
Height
69.5 mm
651 mm
Package weight
27.2 kg
13.6 kg
Soundbar weight
7.1 kg
11.3 kg
Width
1232 mm
351 mm
Connectivity2 differences
Bluetooth
Yes
5.0
Audio formats supported
AAC, AIFF, ALAC, FLAC, MP3, OGG, WAV
AAC, FLAC, MP3, WAV, WMA
Audio2 differences
Audio output channels
11.1.4 channels
2.0 channels
Soundbar speaker RMS power
47 W
500 W
General5 differences
Package depth
277 mm
405 mm
Package height
621 mm
428 mm
Package width
1303 mm
718 mm
RMS rated power
47 W
500 W
Wall Mountable
Yes
No
Where to buy

Specs verified against manufacturer data. Prices in USD before tax; we may earn a commission from qualifying purchases.

Community

Which would you buy?

One vote per person. Results appear after you vote.