Tested · Scored · RankedNEWinstax mini Evo 2 — full review & score →
Head to head · 2 products

HW-Q64GC vs MX-T50

Verified specs side by side. The green tick marks the better value on each measurable row.

Comparing 2 products
HW-Q64GC
HW-Q64GC—Score pending
Check price
View specs
MX-T50
MX-T50—Score pending
Check price
View specs
The short verdict

Scores pending

We haven’t scored these yet. Use the measured differences and full specs below.

HW-Q64GC
—
MX-T50
—
Choose the HW-Q64GC if
  • Lighter in the hand (3,500 vs 11,300 g)
Full specs →
At a glance

Key differences

Measured differences only. Ties and tiny gaps are left out.
Why pick theHW-Q64GC1 win
−7,800 gLighter in the hand3,500 vs 11,300 g
Check priceNo store price yet
Why pick theMX-T500 wins
No measured advantages in our spec data. Check the full specs below.
Check priceNo store price yet
Full specs

Side-by-side specifications

Battery & charging1 difference
Sleep power
0.5 W
0.5 W
Soundbar power consumption
31 W
110 W
Design7 differences
Weight
3500 g
11300 g
Colors
Black, Titanium
Black
Depth
105 mm
323 mm
Height
57 mm
651 mm
Package weight
11.4 kg
13.6 kg
Soundbar weight
3.5 kg
11.3 kg
Width
1030 mm
351 mm
Connectivity2 differences
Bluetooth
4.2
5.0
Audio formats supported
AAC · MP3 · MP4
AAC, FLAC, MP3, WAV, WMA
Audio1 difference
Audio output channels
3.1 channels
2.0 channels
General5 differences
Package depth
1088 mm
405 mm
Package height
452 mm
428 mm
Package width
238 mm
718 mm
RMS rated power
180 W
500 W
Wall Mountable
Yes
No
Where to buy

Specs verified against manufacturer data. Prices in USD before tax; we may earn a commission from qualifying purchases.

Community

Which would you buy?

One vote per person. Results appear after you vote.