Tested · Scored · RankedNEWinstax mini Evo 2 — full review & score →
Head to head · 2 products

HW-Q64B vs MX-T50

Verified specs side by side. The green tick marks the better value on each measurable row.

Comparing 2 products
HW-Q64B
HW-Q64B—Score pending
Check price
View specs
MX-T50
MX-T50—Score pending
Check price
View specs
The short verdict

Scores pending

We haven’t scored these yet. Use the measured differences and full specs below.

HW-Q64B
—
MX-T50
—
Choose the HW-Q64B if
  • Lighter in the hand (3,500 vs 11,300 g)
Full specs →
At a glance

Key differences

Measured differences only. Ties and tiny gaps are left out.
Why pick theHW-Q64B1 win
−7,800 gLighter in the hand3,500 vs 11,300 g
Check priceNo store price yet
Why pick theMX-T500 wins
No measured advantages in our spec data. Check the full specs below.
Check priceNo store price yet
Full specs

Side-by-side specifications

Battery & charging1 difference
Sleep power
0.5 W
0.5 W
Soundbar power consumption
31 W
110 W
Design6 differences
Weight
3500 g
11300 g
Depth
105 mm
323 mm
Height
57 mm
651 mm
Package weight
11.7 kg
13.6 kg
Soundbar weight
3.5 kg
11.3 kg
Width
1030 mm
351 mm
Connectivity4 differences
Wi-Fi
No
Yes
Bluetooth
4.2
5.0
Audio formats supported
AAC, AIFF, FLAC, MP3, OGG, WAV, WMA
AAC, FLAC, MP3, WAV, WMA
Connectivity technology
Wireless
Wired & Wireless
Audio2 differences
Audio output channels
3.1 channels
2.0 channels
Soundbar speaker RMS power
340 W
500 W
General5 differences
Package depth
255 mm
405 mm
Package height
460 mm
428 mm
Package width
1066 mm
718 mm
RMS rated power
340 W
500 W
Wall Mountable
Yes
No
Where to buy

Specs verified against manufacturer data. Prices in USD before tax; we may earn a commission from qualifying purchases.

Community

Which would you buy?

One vote per person. Results appear after you vote.