Tested · Scored · RankedNEWinstax mini Evo 2 — full review & score →
Head to head · 2 products

HW-Q600C vs MX-T50

Verified specs side by side. The green tick marks the better value on each measurable row.

Comparing 2 products
HW-Q600C
HW-Q600C—Score pending
Check price
View specs
MX-T50
MX-T50—Score pending
Check price
View specs
The short verdict

Scores pending

We haven’t scored these yet. Use the measured differences and full specs below.

HW-Q600C
—
MX-T50
—
Choose the HW-Q600C if
  • First-time soundbar buyers who want bass and height in one package.
Full specs →
At a glance

Key differences

Measured differences only. Ties and tiny gaps are left out.
Why pick theHW-Q600C1 win
−7,500 gLighter in the hand3,800 vs 11,300 g
Check priceNo store price yet
Why pick theMX-T500 wins
No measured advantages in our spec data. Check the full specs below.
Check priceNo store price yet
Full specs

Side-by-side specifications

Design6 differences
Weight
3800 g
11300 g
Depth
105 mm
323 mm
Height
57 mm
651 mm
Package weight
11.7 kg
13.6 kg
Soundbar weight
3.8 kg
11.3 kg
Width
1030 mm
351 mm
Connectivity4 differences
Wi-Fi
No
Yes
Bluetooth
Yes
5.0
Audio formats supported
AAC, AIFF, FLAC, LPCM, MP3, OGG, WAV
AAC, FLAC, MP3, WAV, WMA
Connectivity technology
Wireless
Wired & Wireless
Audio1 difference
Audio output channels
3.1.2 channels
2.0 channels
General4 differences
Package depth
238 mm
405 mm
Package height
452 mm
428 mm
Package width
1088 mm
718 mm
RMS rated power
34 W
500 W
Where to buy

Specs verified against manufacturer data. Prices in USD before tax; we may earn a commission from qualifying purchases.

Community

Which would you buy?

One vote per person. Results appear after you vote.