The short verdict
Scores pending
We haven’t scored these yet. Use the measured differences and full specs below.
WG-M1 action sports camera 14 MP Full HD CMOS 25.4 / 2.3 mm (1 / 2.3") Wi-Fi 151 g—
WG-M2 Orange action sports camera 8 MP Full HD CMOS 25.4 / 2.3 mm (1 / 2.3") Wi-Fi 114 g—
Choose the WG-M1 action sports camera 14 MP Full HD CMOS 25.4 / 2.3 mm (1 / 2.3") Wi-Fi 151 g if
- More RAM for multitasking (0.1 vs 0.068 GB)
Choose the WG-M2 Orange action sports camera 8 MP Full HD CMOS 25.4 / 2.3 mm (1 / 2.3") Wi-Fi 114 g if
- Lighter in the hand (114 vs 151 g)
Key differences
Measured differences only. Ties and tiny gaps are left out.
Why pick theWG-M1 action sports camera 14 MP Full HD CMOS 25.4 / 2.3 mm (1 / 2.3") Wi-Fi 151 g1 win+47%More RAM for multitasking0.1 vs 0.068 GB
Check priceNo store price yet
Why pick theWG-M2 Orange action sports camera 8 MP Full HD CMOS 25.4 / 2.3 mm (1 / 2.3") Wi-Fi 114 g1 win−37 gLighter in the hand114 vs 151 g
Check priceNo store price yet
Full specs
Side-by-side specifications
Specs verified against manufacturer data. Prices in USD before tax; we may earn a commission from qualifying purchases.
Community
One vote per person. Results appear after you vote.Which would you buy?
People also comparevsDJI Osmo Pocket 4P vs Ricoh WG-M2 Orange action sports camera 8 MP Full HD CMOS 25.4 / 2.3 mm (1 / 2.3") Wi-Fi 114 gvsDJI Osmo Pocket 4P vs Ricoh WG-M1 action sports camera 14 MP Full HD CMOS 25.4 / 2.3 mm (1 / 2.3") Wi-Fi 151 gvsHoverAir Versa vs Ricoh WG-M1 action sports camera 14 MP Full HD CMOS 25.4 / 2.3 mm (1 / 2.3") Wi-Fi 151 g