Acer ET271 vs Acer Nitro QG271 M3bmiipx

The short verdict

Scores pending

We haven’t scored these yet. Use the measured differences and full specs below.

ET271

—

Nitro QG271 M3bmiipx

—

Choose the ET271 if

Brighter screen outdoors (300 vs 250 nits peak)

Full specs →

Choose the Nitro QG271 M3bmiipx if

Smoother motion (180 vs 75 Hz)

Full specs →

At a glance

Key differences

Measured differences only. Ties and tiny gaps are left out.

Why pick theET2711 win

+20%Brighter screen outdoors300 vs 250 nits peak

Check priceNo store price yet

Why pick theNitro QG271 M3bmiipx1 win

+140%Smoother motion180 vs 75 Hz

Check priceNo store price yet

Full specs

Side-by-side specifications

Display3 differences

Screen size

27"

Refresh rate

75 Hz

180 Hz

Brightness

300 nits

250 nits

Resolution

1920 × 1080

Pixel density

81 ppi

Panel Type

PLS

IPS

Battery & charging1 difference

Power consumption (average)

19.5 W

23 W

Connectivity1 difference

Connectivity

1 x HDMI 1.4

2 x HDMI 2.0

Audio1 difference

Speakers

2 x 4 W (watts)

2 x 2 W (watts)

General4 differences

Model aliases

ET271bi

QG271M3bmiipx QG271M3 QG271 M3 UM.HQ1SJ.301 UM.HQ1EE.303

Model year

2017

2025

Certifications

ENERGY STAR ErP

CCC CE FCC ISO9241-307 J-Moss Green Mark MPR II RoHS VCCI-B

Contrast Ratio

1000 : 1

Features

Blue Light Filter Flicker-free technology

6-axis color adjustment Acer Display Widget Acer VisionCare AMD FreeSync Premium Black Boost Blue Light Filter ComfyView Flicker-free technology Low Dimming ZeroFrame Design

VESA mounting

Yes

Where to buy

Specs verified against manufacturer data. Prices in USD before tax; we may earn a commission from qualifying purchases.

Community

Which would you buy?

One vote per person. Results appear after you vote.

ET271 vs Nitro QG271 M3bmiipx

Scores pending

Key differences

Side-by-side specifications

Which would you buy?