Tested · Scored · RankedNEWinstax mini Evo 2 — full review & score →
Head to head · 2 products

Laser for Mac mouse USB Type-A 1600 DPI vs Wireless Optical MI-4200 (Ami 250SP Wireless Optical) mouse RF Wireless

Verified specs side by side. The green tick marks the better value on each measurable row.

Comparing 2 products
Laser for Mac mouse USB Type-A 1600 DPI
Check price
View specs
Wireless Optical MI-4200 (Ami 250SP Wireless Optical) mouse RF Wireless
Check price
View specs
The short verdict

Scores pending

We haven’t scored these yet. Use the measured differences and full specs below.

Laser for Mac mouse USB Type-A 1600 DPI
—
Wireless Optical MI-4200 (Ami 250SP Wireless Optical) mouse RF Wireless
—
Choose the Laser for Mac mouse USB Type-A 1600 DPI if
  • Lighter in the hand (105 vs 700 g)
Full specs →
Wireless Optical MI-4200 (Ami 250SP Wireless Optical) mouse RF Wireless
    Full specs →
    At a glance

    Key differences

    Measured differences only. Ties and tiny gaps are left out.
    Why pick theLaser for Mac mouse USB Type-A 1600 DPI1 win
    −595 gLighter in the hand105 vs 700 g
    Check priceNo store price yet
    Why pick theWireless Optical MI-4200 (Ami 250SP Wireless Optical) mouse RF Wireless0 wins
    No measured advantages in our spec data. Check the full specs below.
    Check priceNo store price yet
    Full specs

    Side-by-side specifications

    Performance1 difference
    OS
    Mac OS X 10.3 Panther Mac OS X 10.4 Tiger Mac OS X 10.5 Leopard +
    Microsoft Windows 95, 98, ME, 2000, XP
    Camera1 difference
    Sensor Technology
    Laser
    Optical
    Design1 difference
    Weight
    105 g
    700 g
    Connectivity1 difference
    Connection Type
    USB Type-A
    RF Wireless
    General1 difference
    Button Count
    6
    5
    Where to buy

    Specs verified against manufacturer data. Prices in USD before tax; we may earn a commission from qualifying purchases.

    Community

    Which would you buy?

    One vote per person. Results appear after you vote.