Tested · Scored · RankedNEWinstax mini Evo 2 — full review & score →
Head to head · 2 products

Centa Mini mouse Travel Ambidextrous USB Type-A Optical vs Wireless Optical MI-4200 (Ami 250SP Wireless Optical) mouse RF Wireless

Verified specs side by side. The green tick marks the better value on each measurable row.

Comparing 2 products
Centa Mini mouse Travel Ambidextrous USB Type-A Optical
Check price
View specs
Wireless Optical MI-4200 (Ami 250SP Wireless Optical) mouse RF Wireless
Check price
View specs
The short verdict

Scores pending

We haven’t scored these yet. Use the measured differences and full specs below.

Centa Mini mouse Travel Ambidextrous USB Type-A Optical
—
Wireless Optical MI-4200 (Ami 250SP Wireless Optical) mouse RF Wireless
—
Choose the Centa Mini mouse Travel Ambidextrous USB Type-A Optical if
  • Lighter in the hand (63 vs 700 g)
Full specs →
Wireless Optical MI-4200 (Ami 250SP Wireless Optical) mouse RF Wireless
    Full specs →
    At a glance

    Key differences

    Measured differences only. Ties and tiny gaps are left out.
    Why pick theCenta Mini mouse Travel Ambidextrous USB Type-A Optical1 win
    −637 gLighter in the hand63 vs 700 g
    Check priceNo store price yet
    Why pick theWireless Optical MI-4200 (Ami 250SP Wireless Optical) mouse RF Wireless0 wins
    No measured advantages in our spec data. Check the full specs below.
    Check priceNo store price yet
    Full specs

    Side-by-side specifications

    Design2 differences
    Weight
    63 g
    700 g
    Width Mm
    2.2 in (56 mm)
    width_mm
    Connectivity1 difference
    Connection Type
    USB Type-A
    RF Wireless
    General2 differences
    Button Count
    3
    5
    Buttons Type
    Pressed buttons
    buttons_type
    Where to buy

    Specs verified against manufacturer data. Prices in USD before tax; we may earn a commission from qualifying purchases.

    Community

    Which would you buy?

    One vote per person. Results appear after you vote.