Head to head · 2 products

AMI mouse PS/2 Opto-mechanical 400 DPI vs Wireless Optical MI-4200 (Ami 250SP Wireless Optical) mouse RF Wireless

Verified specs side by side. The green tick marks the better value on each measurable row.

Comparing 2 products
The short verdict

Scores pending

We haven’t scored these yet. Use the measured differences and full specs below.

AMI mouse PS/2 Opto-mechanical 400 DPI
—
Wireless Optical MI-4200 (Ami 250SP Wireless Optical) mouse RF Wireless
—
Choose the AMI mouse PS/2 Opto-mechanical 400 DPI if
  • Lighter in the hand (300 vs 700 g)
Full specs →
Wireless Optical MI-4200 (Ami 250SP Wireless Optical) mouse RF Wireless
    Full specs →
    At a glance

    Key differences

    Measured differences only. Ties and tiny gaps are left out.
    Why pick theAMI mouse PS/2 Opto-mechanical 400 DPI1 win
    −400 gLighter in the hand300 vs 700 g
    Check priceNo store price yet
    Why pick theWireless Optical MI-4200 (Ami 250SP Wireless Optical) mouse RF Wireless0 wins
    No measured advantages in our spec data. Check the full specs below.
    Check priceNo store price yet
    Full specs

    Side-by-side specifications

    Performance1 difference
    OS
    Microsoft DOS · Microsoft Windows 3.x/95/98 · Microsoft Windows 2000 / NT4.0
    Microsoft Windows 95, 98, ME, 2000, XP
    Camera1 difference
    Sensor Technology
    Opto-Mechanical
    Optical
    Design1 difference
    Weight
    300 g
    700 g
    Connectivity1 difference
    Connection Type
    PS/2
    RF Wireless
    General1 difference
    Button Count
    2
    5
    Where to buy

    Specs verified against manufacturer data. Prices in USD before tax; we may earn a commission from qualifying purchases.

    Community

    Which would you buy?

    One vote per person. Results appear after you vote.