Tested · Scored · RankedNEWinstax mini Evo 2 — full review & score →
Head to head · 2 products

MX-ST40B vs MX-T40

Verified specs side by side. The green tick marks the better value on each measurable row.

Comparing 2 products
MX-ST40B
MX-ST40B—Score pending
Check price
View specs
MX-T40
MX-T40—Score pending
Check price
View specs
The short verdict

Scores pending

We haven’t scored these yet. Use the measured differences and full specs below.

MX-ST40B
—
MX-T40
—
Choose the MX-T40 if
  • Lighter in the hand (6,800 vs 8,000 g)
Full specs →
At a glance

Key differences

Measured differences only. Ties and tiny gaps are left out.
Why pick theMX-ST40B0 wins
No measured advantages in our spec data. Check the full specs below.
Check priceNo store price yet
Why pick theMX-T401 win
−1,200 gLighter in the hand6,800 vs 8,000 g
Check priceNo store price yet
Full specs

Side-by-side specifications

Battery & charging1 difference
Sleep power
0.5 W
0.5 W
Power consumption (typical)
40 W
35 W
Design5 differences
Weight
8000 g
6800 g
Depth
256 mm
268 mm
Height
562 mm
530.5 mm
Package weight
9.5 kg
8.4 kg
Width
281 mm
291.5 mm
Connectivity1 difference
Bluetooth
Yes
Yes
Connectivity technology
Wired & Wireless
Wireless
General5 differences
Package depth
330 mm
342 mm
Package height
336 mm
600 mm
Package width
630 mm
360 mm
Recommended Usage
Home
Universal
RMS rated power
160 W
300 W
Where to buy

Specs verified against manufacturer data. Prices in USD before tax; we may earn a commission from qualifying purchases.

Community

Which would you buy?

One vote per person. Results appear after you vote.