Tested · Scored · RankedNEWinstax mini Evo 2 — full review & score →
Head to head · 2 products

HW-QS760GF vs MX-T50

Verified specs side by side. The green tick marks the better value on each measurable row.

Comparing 2 products
HW-QS760GF
HW-QS760GF—Score pending
Check price
View specs
MX-T50
MX-T50—Score pending
Check price
View specs
The short verdict

Scores pending

We haven’t scored these yet. Use the measured differences and full specs below.

HW-QS760GF
—
MX-T50
—
Choose the HW-QS760GF if
  • Lighter in the hand (4,400 vs 11,300 g)
Full specs →
At a glance

Key differences

Measured differences only. Ties and tiny gaps are left out.
Why pick theHW-QS760GF1 win
−6,900 gLighter in the hand4,400 vs 11,300 g
Check priceNo store price yet
Why pick theMX-T500 wins
No measured advantages in our spec data. Check the full specs below.
Check priceNo store price yet
Full specs

Side-by-side specifications

Battery & charging1 difference
Sleep power
0.5 W
0.5 W
Soundbar power consumption
38 W
110 W
Design5 differences
Weight
4400 g
11300 g
Depth
120 mm
323 mm
Height
51 mm
651 mm
Package weight
16.3 kg
13.6 kg
Width
1160 mm
351 mm
Connectivity2 differences
Wi-Fi
Yes
Yes
Bluetooth
5.2
5.0
Audio formats supported
AAC, AIFF, FLAC, MP3, OGG, WAV
AAC, FLAC, MP3, WAV, WMA
Audio2 differences
Audio output channels
3.1.2 channels
2.0 channels
Soundbar speaker RMS power
38 W
500 W
General5 differences
Package depth
301 mm
405 mm
Package height
401 mm
428 mm
Package width
1242 mm
718 mm
RMS rated power
38 W
500 W
Wall Mountable
Yes
No
Where to buy

Specs verified against manufacturer data. Prices in USD before tax; we may earn a commission from qualifying purchases.

Community

Which would you buy?

One vote per person. Results appear after you vote.