Tested · Scored · RankedNEWinstax mini Evo 2 — full review & score →
Head to head · 2 products

HW-Q990F vs MX-T40

Verified specs side by side. The green tick marks the better value on each measurable row.

Comparing 2 products
HW-Q990F
HW-Q990F—Score pending
Check price
View specs
MX-T40
MX-T40—Score pending
Check price
View specs
The short verdict

Scores pending

We haven’t scored these yet. Use the measured differences and full specs below.

HW-Q990F
—
MX-T40
—
Choose the HW-Q990F if
  • Big-screen owners who want reference-level surround.
Full specs →
Choose the MX-T40 if
  • Lighter in the hand (6,800 vs 7,300 g)
Full specs →
At a glance

Key differences

Measured differences only. Ties and tiny gaps are left out.
Why pick theHW-Q990F0 wins
No measured advantages in our spec data. Check the full specs below.
Check priceNo store price yet
Why pick theMX-T401 win
−500 gLighter in the hand6,800 vs 7,300 g
Check priceNo store price yet
Full specs

Side-by-side specifications

Battery & charging1 difference
Sleep power
0.5 W
0.5 W
Power consumption (typical)
41 W
35 W
Design5 differences
Weight
7300 g
6800 g
Depth
138 mm
268 mm
Height
70.8 mm
530.5 mm
Package weight
23.8 kg
8.4 kg
Width
1232 mm
291.5 mm
Connectivity3 differences
Wi-Fi
Yes
No
Bluetooth
5.3
Yes
Connectivity technology
Wired & Wireless
Wireless
Audio2 differences
Audio output channels
11.1.4 channels
2.0 channels
Number of speakers
23
2
General4 differences
Package depth
296 mm
342 mm
Package height
423 mm
600 mm
Package width
1309 mm
360 mm
RMS rated power
756 W
300 W
Where to buy

Specs verified against manufacturer data. Prices in USD before tax; we may earn a commission from qualifying purchases.

Community

Which would you buy?

One vote per person. Results appear after you vote.