Tested · Scored · RankedNEWinstax mini Evo 2 — full review & score →
Head to head · 2 products

HW-Q930F vs MX-T40

Verified specs side by side. The green tick marks the better value on each measurable row.

Comparing 2 products
HW-Q930F
HW-Q930F—Score pending
Check price
View specs
MX-T40
MX-T40—Score pending
Check price
View specs
The short verdict

Scores pending

We haven’t scored these yet. Use the measured differences and full specs below.

HW-Q930F
—
MX-T40
—
Choose the HW-Q930F if
  • Lighter in the hand (5,300 vs 6,800 g)
Full specs →
At a glance

Key differences

Measured differences only. Ties and tiny gaps are left out.
Why pick theHW-Q930F1 win
−1,500 gLighter in the hand5,300 vs 6,800 g
Check priceNo store price yet
Why pick theMX-T400 wins
No measured advantages in our spec data. Check the full specs below.
Check priceNo store price yet
Full specs

Side-by-side specifications

Battery & charging1 difference
Power consumption (typical)
42 W
35 W
Design5 differences
Weight
5300 g
6800 g
Depth
120 mm
268 mm
Height
60.4 mm
530.5 mm
Package weight
20 kg
8.4 kg
Width
1110.7 mm
291.5 mm
Connectivity3 differences
Wi-Fi
Yes
No
Bluetooth
5.3
Yes
Connectivity technology
Wired & Wireless
Wireless
Audio2 differences
Audio output channels
9.1.4 channels
2.0 channels
Number of speakers
17
2
General4 differences
Package depth
296 mm
342 mm
Package height
412 mm
600 mm
Package width
1187 mm
360 mm
RMS rated power
580 W
300 W
Where to buy

Specs verified against manufacturer data. Prices in USD before tax; we may earn a commission from qualifying purchases.

Community

Which would you buy?

One vote per person. Results appear after you vote.