Head to head · 2 products

HW-Q67CT vs MX-T50

Verified specs side by side. The green tick marks the better value on each measurable row.

Comparing 2 products
HW-Q67CT
HW-Q67CT—Score pending
Check price
View specs
MX-T50
MX-T50—Score pending
Check price
View specs
The short verdict

Scores pending

We haven’t scored these yet. Use the measured differences and full specs below.

HW-Q67CT
—
MX-T50
—
Choose the HW-Q67CT if
  • Lighter in the hand (3,400 vs 11,300 g)
Full specs →
At a glance

Key differences

Measured differences only. Ties and tiny gaps are left out.
Why pick theHW-Q67CT1 win
−7,900 gLighter in the hand3,400 vs 11,300 g
Check priceNo store price yet
Why pick theMX-T500 wins
No measured advantages in our spec data. Check the full specs below.
Check priceNo store price yet
Full specs

Side-by-side specifications

Battery & charging1 difference
Sleep power
0.5 W
0.5 W
Soundbar power consumption
38 W
110 W
Design6 differences
Weight
3400 g
11300 g
Depth
104 mm
323 mm
Height
58.4 mm
651 mm
Package weight
12.3 kg
13.6 kg
Soundbar weight
3.4 kg
11.3 kg
Width
980 mm
351 mm
Connectivity2 differences
Bluetooth
Yes
5.0
Audio formats supported
AAC, AIFF, FLAC, MP3, OGG, WAV, WMA
AAC, FLAC, MP3, WAV, WMA
Audio1 difference
Audio output channels
7.1 channels
2.0 channels
General5 differences
Package depth
251.5 mm
405 mm
Package height
460 mm
428 mm
Package width
1036 mm
718 mm
RMS rated power
450 W
500 W
Wall Mountable
Yes
No
Where to buy

Specs verified against manufacturer data. Prices in USD before tax; we may earn a commission from qualifying purchases.

Community

Which would you buy?

One vote per person. Results appear after you vote.