Tested · Scored · RankedNEWinstax mini Evo 2 — full review & score →
Head to head · 2 products

HW-Q64GC vs MX-T40

Verified specs side by side. The green tick marks the better value on each measurable row.

Comparing 2 products
HW-Q64GC
HW-Q64GC—Score pending
Check price
View specs
MX-T40
MX-T40—Score pending
Check price
View specs
The short verdict

Scores pending

We haven’t scored these yet. Use the measured differences and full specs below.

HW-Q64GC
—
MX-T40
—
Choose the HW-Q64GC if
  • Lighter in the hand (3,500 vs 6,800 g)
Full specs →
At a glance

Key differences

Measured differences only. Ties and tiny gaps are left out.
Why pick theHW-Q64GC1 win
−3,300 gLighter in the hand3,500 vs 6,800 g
Check priceNo store price yet
Why pick theMX-T400 wins
No measured advantages in our spec data. Check the full specs below.
Check priceNo store price yet
Full specs

Side-by-side specifications

Battery & charging1 difference
Sleep power
0.5 W
0.5 W
Power consumption (typical)
0.5 W
35 W
Design6 differences
Weight
3500 g
6800 g
Colors
Black, Titanium
Black
Depth
105 mm
268 mm
Height
57 mm
530.5 mm
Package weight
11.4 kg
8.4 kg
Width
1030 mm
291.5 mm
Connectivity2 differences
Bluetooth
4.2
Yes
Connectivity technology
Wired & Wireless
Wireless
Audio1 difference
Audio output channels
3.1 channels
2.0 channels
General4 differences
Package depth
1088 mm
342 mm
Package height
452 mm
600 mm
Package width
238 mm
360 mm
RMS rated power
180 W
300 W
Where to buy

Specs verified against manufacturer data. Prices in USD before tax; we may earn a commission from qualifying purchases.

Community

Which would you buy?

One vote per person. Results appear after you vote.