Head to head · 2 products

HW-B400F vs MX-T50

Verified specs side by side. The green tick marks the better value on each measurable row.

Comparing 2 products
HW-B400F
HW-B400F—Score pending
Check price
View specs
MX-T50
MX-T50—Score pending
Check price
View specs
The short verdict

Scores pending

We haven’t scored these yet. Use the measured differences and full specs below.

HW-B400F
—
MX-T50
—
Choose the HW-B400F if
  • Lighter in the hand (2,100 vs 11,300 g)
Full specs →
At a glance

Key differences

Measured differences only. Ties and tiny gaps are left out.
Why pick theHW-B400F1 win
−9,200 gLighter in the hand2,100 vs 11,300 g
Check priceNo store price yet
Why pick theMX-T500 wins
No measured advantages in our spec data. Check the full specs below.
Check priceNo store price yet
Full specs

Side-by-side specifications

Battery & charging
Sleep power
0.5 W
0.5 W
Design6 differences
Weight
2100 g
11300 g
Depth
107 mm
323 mm
Height
66.5 mm
651 mm
Package weight
2.9 kg
13.6 kg
Soundbar weight
2.1 kg
11.3 kg
Width
641 mm
351 mm
Connectivity3 differences
Wi-Fi
No
Yes
Bluetooth
4.2
5.0
Audio formats supported
AAC, FLAC, MP3, WAV
AAC, FLAC, MP3, WAV, WMA
Audio1 difference
Soundbar speaker RMS power
40 W
500 W
General5 differences
Package depth
155 mm
405 mm
Package height
120 mm
428 mm
Package width
928 mm
718 mm
RMS rated power
40 W
500 W
Wall Mountable
Yes
No
Where to buy

Specs verified against manufacturer data. Prices in USD before tax; we may earn a commission from qualifying purchases.

Community

Which would you buy?

One vote per person. Results appear after you vote.