QNAP TS-216G vs QNAP TS-433

The short verdict

Scores pending

We haven’t scored these yet. Use the measured differences and full specs below.

TS-216G

—

TS-433

—

Choose the TS-216G if

Lighter in the hand (1,450 vs 2,070 g)

Full specs →

TS-433

Full specs →

At a glance

Key differences

Measured differences only. Ties and tiny gaps are left out.

Why pick theTS-216G1 win

−620 gLighter in the hand1,450 vs 2,070 g

Check priceNo store price yet

Why pick theTS-4330 wins

No measured advantages in our spec data. Check the full specs below.

Check priceNo store price yet

Full specs

Side-by-side specifications

Performance3 differences

RAM

4 GB

Storage (max)

4 GB

Device class

Large Enterprise Business

Home & Home Office

Installed storage drive type

Chipset

Cortex-A Cortex-A55

ARM Cortex-A55

Processor family

Cortex-A

ARM

Processor frequency

2 GHz

Storage drives installed

Total installed storage capacity

0 TB

Design2 differences

Weight

1450 g

2070 g

Fan diameter

7 cm

12 cm

Connectivity2 differences

Jumbo frames support

Yes

Maximum RAM supported

4 GB

Number of storage drives supported

Storage drive sizes supported

2.5,3.5"

Supported storage drive interfaces

Serial ATA

Serial ATA III, Serial ATA II

Supported storage drive types

HDD & SSD

USB 2.0 ports quantity

General4 differences

Ethernet LAN

Yes

Ethernet LAN data rates

10,100,1000,2500 Mbit/s

100,1000,2500 Mbit/s

Led Indicators

HDD, LAN, Status, USB

Power, Reset, USB

Manufacturer Sku

TS-216G

TS-433-4G

Model Number

TS-216G

TS-433

Where to buy

Specs verified against manufacturer data. Prices in USD before tax; we may earn a commission from qualifying purchases.

Community

Which would you buy?

One vote per person. Results appear after you vote.

TS-216G vs TS-433

Scores pending

Key differences

Side-by-side specifications

Which would you buy?