Tested · Scored · RankedNEWinstax mini Evo 2 — full review & score →
Head to head · 2 TVs

32A4K vs 85QLED870

Verified specs side by side. The green tick marks the better value on each measurable row.

Comparing 2 TVs
32A4K
32A4K—Score pending
Check price
View specs
85QLED870
85QLED870—Score pending
Check price
View specs
The short verdict

Scores pending

We haven’t scored these yet. Use the measured differences and full specs below.

32A4K
—
85QLED870
—
Choose the 32A4K if
  • Larger screen (81.332 vs 2.169 in)
Full specs →
Choose the 85QLED870 if
  • Brighter screen outdoors (1,300 vs 200 nits peak)
Full specs →
At a glance

Key differences

Measured differences only. Ties and tiny gaps are left out.
Why pick the32A4K1 win
+3651%Larger screen81.332 vs 2.169 in
Check priceNo store price yet
Why pick the85QLED8701 win
+550%Brighter screen outdoors1,300 vs 200 nits peak
Check priceNo store price yet
Display7 differences
Screen size
81.332"
2.1685"
Resolution
1366 x 768 pixels
3840 x 2160 pixels
Refresh rate
60 Hz
144 Hz
HDR
No
Yes
Panel type
LED
QLED
Display brightness
200 cd/m²
1300 cd/m²
LED backlighting type
Direct-LED
Full-Array
Picture Features1 difference
Video formats
ASF · AVC · AVI
AVI · H.264 · H.265
Sound1 difference
Power
12 W
50 W
Smart TV2 differences
Platform
VIDAA
Google TV
Timeshift
Yes
No
Connectivity5 differences
Bluetooth
No
Yes
Audio formats supported
AAC · AC3 · FLAC
MP3, WMA
Hdmi Version
1.4
2.1
Image formats supported
BMP, GIF, JPEG, JPG, PNG
BMP, HEIF, JPG
USB recording
Yes
No
Design1 difference
VESA size
100 x 200 mm
600 x 400 mm
General1 difference
Response Time
8 ms
5.7 ms
Where to buy

Specs verified against manufacturer data. Prices in USD before tax; we may earn a commission from qualifying purchases.

Community

Which would you buy?

One vote per person. Results appear after you vote.