Tested · Scored · RankedNEWinstax mini Evo 2 — full review & score →
Head to head · 2 TVs

32A4K vs 55QLED780K

Verified specs side by side. The green tick marks the better value on each measurable row.

Comparing 2 TVs
32A4K
32A4K—Score pending
Check price
View specs
55QLED780K
55QLED780K—Score pending
Check price
View specs
The short verdict

Scores pending

We haven’t scored these yet. Use the measured differences and full specs below.

32A4K
—
55QLED780K
—
Choose the 55QLED780K if
  • Brighter screen outdoors (450 vs 200 nits peak)
  • Larger screen (139.755 vs 32.02 in)
Full specs →
At a glance

Key differences

Measured differences only. Ties and tiny gaps are left out.
Why pick the32A4K0 wins
No measured advantages in our spec data. Check the full specs below.
Check priceNo store price yet
Why pick the55QLED780K2 wins
+125%Brighter screen outdoors450 vs 200 nits peak
+336%Larger screen139.755 vs 32.02 in
Check priceNo store price yet
Display5 differences
Screen size
32.02"
139.755"
Resolution
1366 x 768 pixels
3840 x 2160 pixels
HDR
No
Yes
Panel type
LED
QLED Pro
Display brightness
200 cd/m²
450 cd/m²
Picture Features1 difference
Video formats
ASF · AVC · AVI
AVI · H.264 · H.265
Sound1 difference
Power
12 W
20 W
Smart TV2 differences
Platform
VIDAA
Google TV
Timeshift
Yes
No
Ports1 difference
USB ports
2
1
Connectivity5 differences
Bluetooth
No
Yes
Audio formats supported
AAC · AC3 · FLAC
MP3, WMA
Hdmi Version
1.4
2.1
Image formats supported
BMP, GIF, JPEG, JPG, PNG
BMP, HEIF, JPG
USB recording
Yes
No
Design1 difference
VESA size
100 x 200 mm
300 x 300 mm
General1 difference
Response Time
8 ms
15 ms
Where to buy

Specs verified against manufacturer data. Prices in USD before tax; we may earn a commission from qualifying purchases.

Community

Which would you buy?

One vote per person. Results appear after you vote.