Acer Nitro QG271 M3bmiipx vs Acer V276HL Cbmdpx

The short verdict

Scores pending

We haven’t scored these yet. Use the measured differences and full specs below.

Nitro QG271 M3bmiipx

—

V276HL Cbmdpx

—

Choose the Nitro QG271 M3bmiipx if

Smoother motion (180 vs 76 Hz)

Full specs →

Choose the V276HL Cbmdpx if

Brighter screen outdoors (300 vs 250 nits peak)

Full specs →

At a glance

Key differences

Measured differences only. Ties and tiny gaps are left out.

Why pick theNitro QG271 M3bmiipx1 win

+137%Smoother motion180 vs 76 Hz

Check priceNo store price yet

Why pick theV276HL Cbmdpx1 win

+20%Brighter screen outdoors300 vs 250 nits peak

Check priceNo store price yet

Full specs

Side-by-side specifications

Display3 differences

Screen size

27"

Refresh rate

180 Hz

76 Hz

Brightness

250 nits

300 nits

Resolution

1920 × 1080

Pixel density

81 ppi

Panel Type

IPS

Battery & charging1 difference

Power consumption (average)

23 W

26.6 W

Connectivity1 difference

Connectivity

2 x HDMI 2.0

1 x DisplayPort 1.2

General5 differences

Model year

2025

2015

Certifications

CCC CE FCC ISO9241-307 J-Moss Green Mark MPR II RoHS VCCI-B

ENERGY STAR TCO Displays 6.0

Contrast Ratio

1000 : 1

3000 : 1

Features

6-axis color adjustment Acer Display Widget Acer VisionCare AMD FreeSync Premium Black Boost Blue Light Filter ComfyView Flicker-free technology Low Dimming ZeroFrame Design

Flicker-free technology

Included Accessories

HDMI cable

D-sub cable

VESA mounting

Yes

Where to buy

Specs verified against manufacturer data. Prices in USD before tax; we may earn a commission from qualifying purchases.

Community

Which would you buy?

One vote per person. Results appear after you vote.

Nitro QG271 M3bmiipx vs V276HL Cbmdpx

Scores pending

Key differences

Side-by-side specifications

Which would you buy?