Acer Nitro QG271 M3bmiipx vs Acer RT270

The short verdict

Scores pending

We haven’t scored these yet. Use the measured differences and full specs below.

Nitro QG271 M3bmiipx

—

RT270

—

Choose the Nitro QG271 M3bmiipx if

Smoother motion (180 vs 61 Hz)

Full specs →

RT270

Full specs →

At a glance

Key differences

Measured differences only. Ties and tiny gaps are left out.

Why pick theNitro QG271 M3bmiipx1 win

+195%Smoother motion180 vs 61 Hz

Check priceNo store price yet

Why pick theRT2700 wins

No measured advantages in our spec data. Check the full specs below.

Check priceNo store price yet

Full specs

Side-by-side specifications

Display1 difference

Screen size

27"

Refresh rate

180 Hz

61 Hz

Brightness

250 nits

Resolution

1920 × 1080

Pixel density

81 ppi

Battery & charging1 difference

Power consumption (average)

23 W

21 W

Connectivity1 difference

Connectivity

2 x HDMI 2.0

1 x HDMI 1.4

General6 differences

Model aliases

QG271M3bmiipx QG271M3 QG271 M3 UM.HQ1SJ.301 UM.HQ1EE.303

RT270bmid RT270 bmid

Model year

2025

2016

Certifications

CCC CE FCC ISO9241-307 J-Moss Green Mark MPR II RoHS VCCI-B

ENERGY STAR TCO Displays 6.0

Contrast Ratio

1000 : 1

Features

6-axis color adjustment Acer Display Widget Acer VisionCare AMD FreeSync Premium Black Boost Blue Light Filter ComfyView Flicker-free technology Low Dimming ZeroFrame Design

Blue Light Filter DDC/CI Flicker-free technology

Included Accessories

HDMI cable

DVI-D cable

VESA mounting

Yes

Where to buy

Specs verified against manufacturer data. Prices in USD before tax; we may earn a commission from qualifying purchases.

Community

Which would you buy?

One vote per person. Results appear after you vote.

Nitro QG271 M3bmiipx vs RT270

Scores pending

Key differences

Side-by-side specifications

Which would you buy?